January 9, 2012

Biological Father Regains Custody of Two-Year-Old Cherokee Daughter in Adoption Battle

The biological father of a 2-year-old Cherokee girl, who was adopted by non-Native parents in 2009, has regained custody.

The 1978 Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), which protects American Indian families from being separated, trumped South Carolina law in a December 30 appellate court ruling. In accordance with South Carolina law, a father is stripped of his paternity rights when he has not provided pre-birth support or taken steps to be a father shortly after birth, the adoptive couple’s spokeswoman, Jessica Munday, told Reuters.

On New Year’s Eve, the biological father Dusten Brown took his daughter, Veronica, from her home in Charleston, South Carolina to his residence in Bartlesville, Oklahoma, a neighboring city of the Tahlequah-based Cherokee Nation.

“Their culture, nobody else can provide that for them. And they have a right to be able to experience that relationship with their tribe,” explained David Simmons with the National Indian Child Welfare Association to WLTX.

But Matt and Melanie Capobianco, who adopted Veronica from birth mother, Christina Maldonado, plan to appeal to the South Carolina Supreme Court. The couple have started a petition to “consider the best interests of the child” on change.org, and supporters and the Christian Alliance for Indian Child Welfare created the blog SaveVeronica.org, which calls for the toddler to be returned to her adoptive parents. The blog features background information on the adoption case, links to media coverage and numerous photos of the happy toddler.

Conflicting media reports detail the adoption process. Munday told Reuters that the Capobiancos legally adopted Veronica at birth through an open adoption. “Matt cut the umbilical cord, and they were the first people to hold her,” Munday told Reuters on Sunday.

But CNN reported that Veronica remained with her birth mother for the first few months of her life. In 2009, Veronica’s biological mother and father signed a waiver agreeing to put the infant up for adoption. According to Brown’s attorney, Shannon Jones, Brown signed the legal document, but did not fully understand it. Shortly after her birth, Brown, a U.S. Army solider not married to the birth mother, deployed for one year, and the baby was sent to the home of Matt and Melanie Capobianco. Four months after Veronica’s birth, Brown took legal action, seeking custody of his daughter.

“My client has been fighting for custody of his daughter since shortly after her birth,” Shannon Jones told CNN by e-mail. “He loves this child with all his heart.”

The case has made national headlines and caused a media uproar. South Carolina newspaper The Post and Courier called Brown a “stranger” to his child Veronica and also referred to the toddler as the “daughter” of the non-Indian couple, reported Indianz.com. Many news sites tell the story of the heartbroken adoptive parents, who spoke to media outlets before the Cherokee Nation and Brown filed a motion for a gag order to prevent the Capobiancos from talking about the case. Munday said the couple is cooperating.

“In an effort to quell the undue outside attention to this sensitive affair, the Cherokee Nation attorney general’s office filed a motion for a gag order in the Maldonado case Wednesday afternoon, along with a motion to release the judge’s final order to the public,” Chrissi Ross Nimmo, the tribe’s assistant attorney general, told News on 6. “I ask that all parties involved in the matter respect the confidential nature of these juvenile court proceedings.”

Prior to the gag order request, Matt Capobianco told WCIV-TV: “It’s awful. Everybody keeps saying how bad they feel for us, but she’s a 2-year-old girl who got shoved in a truck and driven to Oklahoma with strangers.”

Read more @ Indian Country Today Media Network.comTurquoise Intervention - ICTMN.com.


  1. “regained custody” is incorrect. He never had custody to begin with. He signed a TPR and never saw the child. Research.

    Comment by Ashley — February 28, 2012 @ 2:00 am

  2. This disgusts me.

    Comment by melissa corder — September 2, 2012 @ 4:06 am

  3. Dusten Brown is 3% indian and legally relinquished his rights to the child. Dusten Brown is a scum bag.

    Comment by dave koch — December 7, 2012 @ 4:29 am

  4. This is atrocious. To say that “Brown signed the legal document, but did not fully understand it” is an affront to the reader’s intelligence. Race and ethnicity have no place in a decision regarding whether or not a child should be stripped away from her loving parents. To affirm that they do is a most backward and blatant display of racism.

    Comment by joseph Hooker — December 8, 2012 @ 2:34 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Blog powered by Wordpress