::Native.Strength::

November 30, 2011

Canada Racks Up Fossil Awards in Durban as Rumors of Kyoto Withdrawal Swirl

As rumors swirled about Canada’s potential withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol on greenhouse gas emissions, the nation continued its Fossil Award–winning sweep at the COP17 talks in Durban, South Africa, on November 30 as the Climate Action Network (CAN) handed out its daily dose of anti-kudos to countries that put pollution-causing development ahead of lives.

On opening day, November 29, the northern nation won both second and first place for Environmental Minister Peter Kent’s continued bashing of developing countries as well as his implication that Canada would likely not sign on for an extension of the accord on emissions targets signed in Kyoto, Japan, in 1997.

In an interview with the Canadian Press before leaving for Durban, Kent said that lesser-developed countries must stop “wielding the historical guilty card” in asking for less-stringent emissions targets just because industrial countries historically have created more greenhouse gas emissions than other nations.

Kent further fueled the fire by claiming that “from Canada’s point of view, Kyoto was the biggest mistake the previous Liberal government made,” referring to Canada’s signing of the Kyoto Protocol.

This as the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) in its annual report to the U.N. talks said that 2011 has been the warmest year on record as far as climate goes.

With debate still raging over the use of bituminous crude from the notorious oil sands of northern Alberta, Canada, it would seem that Kent is hardly one to talk. Even China, one of the alleged major emitters, called on Canada to set a better example vis a vis combatting climate change. A Canadian withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol would hurt the international community’s attempts to mitigate climate change, the deputy head of the Chinese delegation to Durban told the Chinese news agency Xinhua. It would “definitely add to the obstacles in our negotiation,” he said.

At the same time, Archbishop Desmond Tutu and other prominent Africans took out an ad in the conference’s daily newsletter ECO with “A Message for Canada during the UN Climate Summit in Durban” that was essentially a petition urging Canada to set a better example on combatting climate change the way it had against Apartheid in the 1980s.

“Canada, you were once considered a leader on global issues like human rights and environmental protection,” the ad said. “Today you’re home to polluting tar sands oil, speeding the dangerous effects of climate change. For us in Africa, climate change is a life and death issue. By dramatically increasing Canada’s global warming pollution, tar sands mining and drilling makes the problem worse, and exposes millions of Africans to more devastating drought and famine today and in the years to come. It’s time to draw the line. We call on Canada to change course and be a leader in clean energy and to support international action to reduce global warming pollution.”

The U.S.’s decision over the Keystone XL pipeline has been postponed until after the 2012 presidential election, and Canada has indicated it will take its oil sands products to Asia if the U.S. does not allow the construction of a 1,700-mile-long pipeline from Alberta to the Gulf of Mexico. Meanwhile several First Nations are set to reiterate their major opposition to Enbridge’s proposed Northern Gateway pipeline in the wake of a report by the National Resources Defense Council, the sustainable-energy think tank the Pembina Institute, and the marine conservation group the Living Oceans Society saying that the pipeline would risk too much environmental damage to be feasible. Several First Nations of British Columbia will hold a press conference in Vancouver on December 1.

On the day that Kent’s attitude netted Canada’s two opening-day Fossil Awards, third place went to Britain—but only because of its efforts to bring Canada’s tar sands oil into Europe.

“This quotation from Canadian Environment Minister Peter Kent, doesn’t even require paraphrasing in typical fossil humour—it is sufficiently outrageous on its own,” CAN said in bestowing those first Fossils.

Click here to view the embedded video.

Read more @ Indian Country Today Media Network.comInupiat Community Sues Companies Over Ravages of Climate Change - ICTMN.com.

Unification of the People

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , — Don George @ 9:12 pm

Logic tells us that people will worry about what’s going on in their own backyards before thinking about the trials and tribulations of others. But once again, thinking logically, if people show interest in others’ troubles, then they would probably become concerned with their own.

We can go back through history and see that all Native Nations’ problems parallel one another—right through modern times. Old wars and struggles our ancestors fought were over land and the almighty dollar—and they continue today.

The governments of this Turtle Island forced our grandparents onto lands that were of no use to them back then but now, due to a wealth of minerals, are extremely valuable in today’s world. So, once again, the First Nations of Turtle Island are in the way of “progress.” And, once again, the governments of this land are attempting to make each First Nation’s struggles an individual argument. But everything that affects our Mother Earth—such as the redirecting of waters in the southwest that left many Native lands without life-giving water—affects all of us.

One of the beauties of our cultures is that we have our grandparents’ experiences to guide our way. The bodies and bones of our ancestors are feeding these lands and we walk upon them every day—which is one of the old teachings: “Walk Softly Upon The Mother, The Earth.”

Every Native struggle, from Aamjiwnaang’s pollution battle, to protecting the manoomin (wild rice), to the Black Hills battle, affects every one of us. And it is our very duty as the grandchildren of our peoples to continue to fight for this beautiful Mother Earth as our Ancestors did. They fought to the death for all of our relations.

We, the grandchildren of these heroes, are in a unique situation because now we have scientists, lawyers and politicians. Physical battle is no longer an option. Now the fight goes to the halls of the governments and we have relatives educated in these dominant society ways, educated in their laws and lines of thinking. But, once again, the governments have the upper hand because of the old wartime policy: “divide and conquer”!

Look on the maps. Even today, Native “reserves/reservations,” are separate and far apart, and there are military installations placed close by (remember 1995′s Ipperwash crisis?) But we have the Internet and cell phones; we can communicate with one another in solidarity!

Throughout the Indian Wars, our leaders and heroes were attempting to unite the Nations as one voice and one power, and I see it as our duty to continue this path—which is why my wife (who is a Sundancer) and I decided to begin this group: United First Nations Of Turtle Island.

We, as a united group, need as many members as possible, and we need to take an interest in all goings-on across the length and breadth of these lands—just as the original instructions from The Creator given to Original Man said it was our responsibility to do.

We can make a difference as long as we use our gifts and education, guided by the wisdom of the elders and the old ones.

Here are a couple Facebook.com groups created to combat pollution and the big corporations…

Protect Our Manoomin

First Nations Turtle Island

“Protect Our Monaoomin (Wild Rice)” is a group attempting to fight mining in The Great Lakes. The sulfates from the mining are deadly to the sacred rice, which was given to the Ahnsihinabek Nation by The Great Mystery at the Beginning, and now is in danger of being replaced by “hybrid” species of rice, that is able to survive the pollution of the sacred nibi (water).

United First Nations is a group begun by my wife Donna and me, in continuation of Grandfather Chief Tecumseh’s unification of all Native Peoples and Nations across the length and breadth of our beautiful Turtle Island. So, we as Unified Native Nations, can speak out as one voice, with one purpose, to serve and protect our Mother Earth and our respective Native Peoples until the seventh generation, as is the traditional teaching.

In this day and age, we must stand together in unity—Natives and non-Natives—and we Natives can share the beauty of our cultures with these “newcomers,” in the hopes that perhaps these teachings will awaken a far-distant memory of when The Creator came to them and gave them their original instructions on how to live in harmony and love, in this awesomely beautiful creation called Mother Earth.

Don J. George is from Kettle & Stoney Point Band, Ahnishinabe Nation. He is self-employed and interested in uniting all Natives across Turtle Island back to following The Original Instructions Of The Great Mystery.

Read more @ Indian Country Today Media Network.comInupiat Community Sues Companies Over Ravages of Climate Change - ICTMN.com.

Six Students Complete Choctaw Language Minor at Southeastern

In collaboration with the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, the Department of English, Humanities and Literature at Southeastern Oklahoma State University (SE) offers a Choctaw Language and Culture minor, and six students were recently the first to complete the program.

The minor became available in the fall of 2011 and is unique to Southeastern, it’s the “only university right now that Choctaw Nation has an agreement with for the minor,” said Southeastern Native American Center for Student Success Director Chris Wesberry in a release.

To be able to note the completion of the minor on their transcripts, the students have to complete 18 hours of classes in the program. Courses offered include Choctaw Language and Culture 1, 2, 3 and 4, as well as Intermediate Conversational Choctaw and Advanced Conversational Choctaw.

“This partnership with SE helps us to prepare teachers to teach in the Choctaw Language School,” noted the school’s Director Jim Parrish. The school offers classes over the Internet and on One-Net, Oklahoma’s telecommunications network for school and government. One-Net is available at about 40 high schools within the Choctaw Nation, as well as two colleges, Carl Albert State College in Poteau and Eastern Oklahoma State College in Wilburton. In addition to the minor offered at SE, community classes are taught in various locations around Oklahoma, Texas, Arkansas and California.

Those interested in learning the Choctaw language can visit Choctawschool.com where lessons are available, and all words and phrases have audio examples spoken by a fluent speaker.

Read more @ Indian Country Today Media Network.comInupiat Community Sues Companies Over Ravages of Climate Change - ICTMN.com.

Easing Federal Paternalism Over Indian Land Leasing

WASHINGTON – In a move requested by tribes for decades, the federal government is easing its rules for the approval of leases on lands that the federal government holds in trust for tribes and individuals.

Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar and Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs Larry Echo Hawk announced November 28 what they called a “sweeping reform of federal surface leasing regulations for American Indian lands that will streamline the approval process for home ownership, expedite economic development and spur renewable energy development in Indian country.”

In doing so, the Interior Department is proposing a rule that would modify regulations governing the Bureau of Indian Affairs’ current process for land leasing to tribes and Indians. According to Interior officials, the department currently manages approximately 56 million surface acres in Indian country.

The rule calls for enforceable timelines by which the Bureau of Indian Affairs must review leases, and it establishes separate, simplified processes for residential, business, and renewable energy development, so that leases for small mortgages are distinguishable from much larger projects.

The rule offers a 30 day-limit for the BIA to issue decisions on residential leases, subleases, and mortgages. The agency would have 60-days to review leases and subleases for commercial or industrial development. The rule says that if the BIA does not complete its review of subleases in these timeframes, the agreements will automatically go into effect.

“Other proposed changes would eliminate the requirement for BIA approval of permits for short-term activities on Indian lands, such as parades; and requires the BIA to approve leases unless it finds a compelling reason to disapprove,” noted a press release from the Interior Department. “Under the new rule, the BIA would defer to the tribe’s negotiated value for a lease of tribal land and would not require additional, costly appraisals.”

Echo Hawk said the rule goes a long way to break the chains of paternalism that the federal government has held over tribes for too long. “In times past, a lot of federal laws and regulations have exhibited a paternalistic-like attitude from the federal government to First Nations leaders and communities,” Echo Hawk said in response to a question from Indian Country Today Media Network. “What you’re seeing in these regulations is that we’re no longer trying to exercise federal authority. In consultation with tribal leaders, we have come up with a plan to transfer much of the decision-making that occurs to let tribal leaders be able to make calls about how to develop their lands and resources….”

Echo Hawk added in a conference call with the press that the department believes the regulations will dramatically reduce BIA interference in tribal land use by eliminating the discretion to disapprove leases—or referring to tribal governments how much they want to charge. “So, we’re restoring the agency of these important decisions back where it belongs—to the tribes, he said.

In sum, Echo Hawk said the proposed rule show “much greater respect” for tribal self-determination: “At its core, this reform is about good government and supporting self-determination for Indian Nations,” he said. “The revised regulations will bring greater transparency, efficiency and workability to the Bureau of Indian Affairs approval process, and will provide tribal communities and individuals certainty and flexibility when it comes to decisions on the use of their land.”

Salazar said the proposed rule would replace established rules that he called “frankly outdated.” He explained that current regulations, adopted by the federal government over five decades ago, take a “one-size fits all” approach to processing all surface leases.

Congressional testimony from tribal leaders and consultation from them has indicated that under the current system simple mortgage applications have sometimes stalled for several years waiting approval from the federal government. Plus, energy and other economic development projects have been slow and difficult to establish under the old way.

Salazar said he expects the change to have a “real impact for individuals and families who want to own a home or build a business.”

“This reform underscores President Obama’s commitment to empower Indian nations and strengthen their economies by expanding opportunities for individual landowners and tribal governments – generating investment, new jobs and revenues,” Salazar said during the November 28 press conference call.

Answering a question from ICTMN, Salazar said the Obama administration has worked hard to reform the federal government’s relationship with Indian country. “I think that our deeds over the past three years speak for themselves,” he said.

“The proposed regulation incorporates numerous changes requested by tribal leaders during extensive consultations this past year and better meets the goals of facilitating and expediting the leasing process for trust lands,” added Principal Deputy Assistant for Indian Affairs Del Laverdure.

Interior officials said that during the initial consultation period more than 2,300 comments were received from more than 70 tribes as well as several federal agencies, including the Department of Housing & Urban Development, the USDA, and the IRS.

The publication of the proposed rule in the Federal Register begins a 60-day public comment period. A BIA regulatory drafting workgroup is scheduled to review the comments and publish the final rule in 2012.

Interior officials said that comments and recommendations may be submitted during the tribal consultation meetings, by e-mail at consultation@bia.gov, or by U.S. Postal Service, overnight carrier or hand-delivery to:

Del Laverdure, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C St., N.W., MS-4141-MIB, Washington, D.C. 20240.

A Q & A document on the proposed rule is offered by Interior Here.

A comparison of existing and proposed regulations is offered by Interior Here.

The proposed rule is online Here.

Read more @ Indian Country Today Media Network.comInupiat Community Sues Companies Over Ravages of Climate Change - ICTMN.com.

Watch the New Zealand All Blacks Play the South African Springboks

Filed under: Arts & Entertainment,News Alerts,Sports,Video — Tags: , , — ICTMN Staff @ 6:30 pm

On November 25th we brought you the story of the incredible rugby powerhouse New Zealand All Blacks, who bested France 8-7 in the 2011 Rugby World Cup Final, and their intimidating, pre-game ritual of performing the Haka, a Maori war cry.

Today we thought we’d bring you an entire game’s worth of incredible video footage of the All Blacks playing the South African Springboks in a 2011 Tri Nations tournament game.  This will give you a great feel for how incredible these athletes are.

Part 1:

Click here to view the embedded video.

Part 2:

Click here to view the embedded video.

Part 3:

Click here to view the embedded video.

Part 4:

Click here to view the embedded video.

Part 5:

Click here to view the embedded video.

Part 6:

Click here to view the embedded video.

Part 7:

Click here to view the embedded video.

Read more @ Indian Country Today Media Network.comInupiat Community Sues Companies Over Ravages of Climate Change - ICTMN.com.

Perpetuating Intergenerational Trauma Through Victimhood

Filed under: NCAI — Tags: , , , — Chuck Trimble @ 5:28 pm

In a letter to the editor of the Syracuse (New York) Post-Standard newspaper, attorney Carrie E. Garrow, an adjunct professor in the Syracuse University College of Law, lamented the recent Supreme Court decision denying further recourse to the Oneida Nation of New York in its land claim. Ms. Garrow is also executive director of the Center for Indigenous Law, Governance and Citizenship at the university.

She made a strong case that the basis for the lower court decision, the “disruptive nature” of Indian land claims, was not on the merits of the claim, but on a largely political consideration of inconveniencing a municipal entity. I fully understand and share her outrage, but one statement she made gives me ongoing concern over the bolstering of a sense of victimhood on the part of Native American students.

In her opening paragraph, Ms. Garrow states: “In the beginning of the fall semester, you can usually spot the first-year law students in the hallway—bright and optimistic, true believers in the U.S. legal system. If you look closely, it is often just as easy to identify the American Indian students. Not by the stereotypical images portrayed by popular culture, but by looking into their eyes. They know the truth about the U.S. legal system—that the doors of justice are closed to Indian nations.” (Emphasis mine.)

It bothers me that even one Indian student would enter any law school with the conviction that the “doors of justice are closed to Indian nations.” It is appropriate then to ask why that student is even entering law school. And if it is the case that he or she really believes it, then who convinced him or her of it?

My brother Sam Deloria has served many years as director, the American Indian Law Center at the University of New Mexico, and has helped an entire generation of Indian students prepare for careers in law. Through my years as director of the National Congress of American Indians in the 1970s, Sam is the person I relied on for help in assessing legal and political problems encountered in Indian Country, and strategizing to address them.

When I read Ms Garrow’s letter in the November 18, 2011 edition of Indianz.com, I called Sam’s attention to the letter and asked for his take on it. Here is what he responded:

“There is no defending the Supreme Court jurisprudence with respect to the Oneida Nation of New York and the damage it has done to the orderly administration of justice.  By upholding the law as it has been understood from the founding of the U.S., the Supreme Court could have made it necessary for the parties to resolve disputes by themselves, at the local level. By siding with the majority race and culture, the Court has indeed engendered at least a disappointment with the legal system, if not outright disrespect. Perceptive members of the majority may well wonder how much they can count on the system if they find themselves on the wrong end of the demographics in the future.

“And there is no defending the attitudes of some non-Indians in New York State, from the very beginning down through history, and the devastating impact these attitudes have had on not only the Native people, but all of the people of New York who have missed the opportunity to enjoy a more fulfilling relationship with their neighbors.

“But there is a larger question for those of us with the opportunity to provide intellectual leadership to younger generations.  For over 30 years, I was the Director of the American Indian Law Center, Inc., and administered the Pre-Law Summer Institute, which has prepared nearly 1,500 Native students to attend law school in an eight-week program.  During that program, students are prepared to become effective advocates.  In doing so, we acknowledge the flaws in the American legal system, which are many.  But it is no favor to future law students or their future clients to see only the flaws and to assert manifest untruths, such as that “the doors of justice are closed to Indian nations”, or that “justice is never on our side”.

“This reminds one of a teenager, complaining that “you NEVER let me do anything” on the occasion of being denied permission to do something that he or she does regularly. It is neither mature nor helpful.

“It is the job of advocates to filter out the emotion and the self-pity and to enable those involved in disputes—clients, as they are called in the system our young lawyers prepare to enter—to reach a sound understanding of the remedies which might be available to them. Anything less is derelict. The most effective Native leaders throughout history—the diplomats, spokespeople, military leaders—all had to keep a clear head and assess the situation with realism, insight and wisdom. It is no favor to our people or our students to encourage petulance rather than maturity.

“This has been a long struggle, for the survival of Native societies. It will continue far beyond the lifetime of those who are now living. Sometimes we will find justice, sometimes we will not. When we despair of the American system, we need only look at the status of our fellow indigenous peoples throughout the world to realize how relatively lucky we are. I know from my own experience that they look at us in the U.S. and hear our complaints with more than a little bemusement.”

Sam and I have for many years discussed the issue of how to give Native American youth a realistic version of history, and an appreciation of the great struggles of the tribal nations and their leaders to preserve and build on their heritage of homelands, and their unique rights and resources. And this against almost-impossible odds.

But the history must be taught with accuracy and dispassion, as history and not as hyperbolic discourse to give Native youth a sense of resentment or embitterment. Among the purposes of education are for students to learn how to think for themselves so that they will be self-sufficient. The last thing they need is for someone judging their Indianness based on how angry they are, or how depressed.

I had quoted Sam before (to some derision, I might add) as stating “College professors could help if they stopped objectifying Indians and treating them as victims. These kids should not have to succeed and develop healthy attitudes in spite of those who are supposed to be teaching them in college. We sell them short when we treat them as victims.”

Charles “Chuck” Trimble was born and raised on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. He was principal founder of the American Indian Press Association in 1969, and served as executive director of the National Congress of American Indians from 1972 to 1978. He is retired and lives in Omaha, Nebraska. His website is IktomisWeb.com.

Read more @ Indian Country Today Media Network.comInupiat Community Sues Companies Over Ravages of Climate Change - ICTMN.com.

Uncontacted Tribes: An Adventure in Non-Discovery

Uncontacted But Not Unbowed: ‘Arrow People’ Guard the Rainforest; Book Review

The advance of “civilization” has not been kind to indigenous people in Amazonia. Enslaved and abused at the hands of loggers and rubber tappers, their extended families decimated by disease, some retreated to the dense forests of the most remote headwaters, where their descendants still shun contact with the outside world.

In Brazil, during much of the last century, the government Indian affairs agency, FUNAI, hired backwoodsmen known as sertanistas to “tame” the “wild Indians” in an effort to reduce violent encounters as the frontier encroached on their lands. Too often, however, even peaceful contact was disastrous for the tribes. In the 1980s, a leading sertanista, Sydney Possuelo, had a change of heart and convinced FUNAI to change course and protect uncontacted tribes by demarcating their lands and declaring them off limits to outsiders.

In 2002, journalist Scott Wallace accompanied Possuelo on an arduous trek through dense rain forest in one of the most remote watersheds of the Amazon to determine the boundaries of a group known only as the Arrow People. The Unconquered: In Search of the Amazon’s Last Uncontacted Tribes (Crown Publishers, 2011) chronicles the journey, mixing the personal hardships Wallace and the rest of the expedition endured for three months with a rare glimpse of life in a world inhabited by a people whose presence is felt, but scarcely seen.

Echoing Amazonia’s earliest European explorers, Wallace crafts a tale that is part gripping adventure story, part window into the unexpected complexities and contradictions of life in a developing country where uncontacted tribes stand between a resource-hungry economy and an area abounding in natural wealth. The reader is left feeling that the Arrow People probably have a better quality of life deep in the forest, depending only on natural resources and the occasional stolen or bartered axe or machete, than “contacted” tribes forced into a market economy in a society that derides them.

_____________________________________________

Interview with Scott Wallace, author of The Unconquered: In Search of the Amazon’s Last Uncontacted Tribes (Crown Publishers, New York, 2011)

Scott Wallace photo by Fraser 270x405 Uncontacted Tribes: An Adventure in Non Discovery

Scott Wallace

Scott Wallace traveled by river and on foot into a remote region of the Brazilian Amazon with government agents mapping the boundaries of territory inhabited by an uncontacted tribe so that the area could be protected from loggers, ranchers and other interlopers. The challenge was to scout the territory without coming into contact with its inhabitants. ICTMN caught up with Wallace so he could elaborate on the story behind the story.

What was it like to plunge into such a remote region?

It was a very challenging, demanding journey, living in isolation from the rest of the world, with the discomforts of primordial tropical forests, especially on a journey of nearly three months. Learning to live without things that we normally take for granted was a challenge. It was also extremely interesting. There was a sense of great camaraderie among some of the expeditionary team. The indigenous people, in particular, were amazingly helpful and of good cheer, and were incredible guides. They knew the forest so well and are so well adapted to it that it would have been impossible to survive for a day without them.

What did you learn that surprised you?

Everything. Frankly, I didn’t know that much about isolated indigenous people before this journey. It was a graduate-level course, the time that I spent there. Traveling with Sydney Possuelo—as temperamental and difficult as that could be at times, he had such an incredible level of knowledge, born of decades of experience in the forest with isolated people. I had been in isolated villages before, but I really didn’t understand a lot about uncontacted tribes before this trip.

What was the hardest adaptation for you?

One was being completely cut off from my kids and my family. We had a satellite phone that suddenly no longer functioned, so I was completely cut off. Also, we take for granted being able to look out and see several hundred yards or several miles. To be in a closed-in forest where you can’t see beyond 20 feet in any direction becomes incredibly claustrophobic after awhile. And only two percent of the light actually filters down from the closed canopy forest to the jungle floor, so you’re in permanent gloom.

How do you gather information about people who shouldn’t be contacted?

You can learn a great deal about people by moving through the forest without contacting them. Possuelo is one of the pre-eminent experts on uncontacted or isolated tribes. Being with him in the field was a tremendous education. Being with the other tribal members of our expedition was also extremely informative. The Matis tribe had been contacted within the past 25 years … and there were a number of Matis with us who were old enough that they could recall things about how they viewed the world [before contact]. That was tremendously valuable. A lot about the Arrow People, the uncontacted group whose land we crossed, necessarily remains a mystery.

How did the Matis perceive life before and after contact?

I think you could probably say it’s worse since contact, although obviously [they] could never go back. They have become accustomed to certain western goods, and certain things [from Brazilian society] are attractive to them now. They have needs that they didn’t have before, and they like to have white man’s goods—shotguns, ammunition, boom boxes, Nike shorts. But they paid an awful price for these things. Two thirds of their tribe was wiped out by infectious disease in the first year following contact. The base of traditional knowledge of the Matis people was severely eroded. They lost most of their elders and shamans. A tremendous demographic shock followed contact that they probably in some ways will never recover from. They live in another world now. But they keep a lot of their traditions alive and vital.

Besides the danger of transmitting diseases to which they have no resistance, why is it important to leave uncontacted tribes alone?

They are isolated because they choose to be, so to try to force yourself upon them is an act of violence and disrespect for their wishes. I say that guardedly, because in a way that is what we did on this expedition, except that our expedition was for the [purpose] of protecting these people and ultimately leaving them alone. We had no interest in actually making contact with them. We had people with us who were skilled in knowing how far you could go without pushing the envelope too far. It’s a question of respecting their boundaries. To barge into their forests uninvited is a violation. They don’t have locked doors, but they do have property rights, and I think they should be left alone and people shouldn’t be trying to go into those areas.

Given what you know now about uncontacted people, what issues deserve more attention?

There seems to be a presumption on the part of most people to think, “Oh, those poor people, how do they live without access to medical care and education and the benefits of society?” I think it’s rather amazing that these people are actually able to live quite well without any of that, and they should be respected in their decision to opt out of what the rest of us have. They are not going to be great beneficiaries of advanced civilization. They are going to end up on the lowest rungs of society if there is contact, abused and despised by people who are barely better off than they are. These isolated groups … are precious and vulnerable, and they deserve our respect and our protection.

Read more @ Indian Country Today Media Network.comInupiat Community Sues Companies Over Ravages of Climate Change - ICTMN.com.

Free Genealogy Assistance

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , — ICTMN Staff @ 4:40 pm

Get free one-on-one genealogy assistance throughout December at the Morningside Branch Library, 2410 Morningside Boulevard, in Port St. Lucie, Florida. Guidance, information and help with Internet searching will be provided December, 7, 14 and 28 from 12:30 to 4 p.m.

The assistance will be provided by Family History Researchers, a group of volunteer genealogists with more than 15 years of experience. Call Patti Kirk at 772-567-7463 to make an appointment or e-mail ckirkfirst@comcast.net. Be sure to bring any family information you already have with you.

Read more @ Indian Country Today Media Network.comInupiat Community Sues Companies Over Ravages of Climate Change - ICTMN.com.

November 29, 2011

Doug Brinkley Lays an Arctic Smackdown on Don Young

Alaska Representative Don Young was in some kind of mood when he heard—or rather, tried not to hear—Rice University professor Douglas Brinkley’s testimony on drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Fortunately, Brinkley was quick with an eloquent and cutting answer. Who says environmentalists won’t hit back?

Click here to view the embedded video.

Wonkette described Young as “giving himself an actual lobotomy in front of a C-SPAN camera,” which is a nice metaphor.

Read more @ Indian Country Today Media Network.comDoug Brinkley Lays an Arctic Smackdown on Don Young - ICTMN.com.

Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio Endorses Rick Perry; A Match Made in Heaven?

Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio, the icon of anti-immigration and tough-on-crime policies, has endorsed Republican presidential wannabe Texas Gov. Rick Perry, an advocate of Christian Dominionism.

Arpaio’s endorsement came on November 29, during a campaign swing with Perry in New Hampshire where Perry’s latest flubs occurred when he asked that all of the college students in the crowd who will be 21 by November 12 support his bid for the presidency. The voting age in the United States is 18. And the 2012 election will be held on November 6, 2012.

Arpaio said that while federal government has failed on border crime and enforcement, Perry led “border surge operations with state, local and federal law enforcement officials have helped shut down the illegal trafficking of weapons, drugs and people,” according to the Washington Times.

“I’m endorsing Rick Perry because we need a tough-on-crime president who will champion and fund full-time border security operations from Brownsville to San Diego,” the sheriff said. “Governor Perry has a superior border security record and plans to make our border and our nation safer.”

Arpaio’s blessing was highly sought after by Republican presidential candidate hopefuls. In an article called “Why Would Anyone Want Joe Arpaio’s Endorsement?” The Atlantic reported that Mitt Romney, Michelle Bachmann and Herman Cain all wooed the self-styled “America’s Toughest Sheriff,” who, according to Fox News, “famously re-instituted chain gangs in 1995 and has also been a major supporter of his state’s controversial SB 1070 immigration law.” Critics of SB 1070 call it a notorious anti-immigration law that targets and profiles Hispanics, American Indians and other people of color in Arizona.

In answering the question, The Atlantic listed a litany of Arpaio’s governing disasters, including litigation by the Justice Department over his alleged illegal withholding documents relating to a civil rights investigation; local investigations into fiscal mismanagement in his Maricopa County offices in one case over the alleged misspending of $99.5 million in public funds slated for inmates that were used to pay officials’ salaries, and earlier this month, the payment by Maricopa County of a $1 million settlement to the family of a man who died in Arpaio’s custody.

But Arpaio may be headed for a fall. A group called Citizens for a Better Arizona announced recently that they plan to form a “citizens posse” to challenge the Maricopa County sheriff in his 2012 re-election bid. Arpaio is currently serving his fifth four-year term.

Read more @ Indian Country Today Media Network.comDoug Brinkley Lays an Arctic Smackdown on Don Young - ICTMN.com.
Older Posts »
Blog powered by Wordpress